Pieter Uys, chairman of fibre operator Maziv, has sharply criticised the Competitors Tribunal’s resolution to dam Vodacom’s acquisition of a co-controlling stake within the firm, saying the decision “is mindless”.
Uys, who additionally holds a senior management function at Maziv investor Remgro and who’s a former CEO of Vodacom Group, was chatting with Sunday Occasions journalist Chris Barron in an interview printed on Sunday (paywall). He informed Barron that the tribunal’s rejection of the merger makes a mockery of presidency assurances to traders that South Africa is open for enterprise.
On 29 October 2024, the tribunal shocked the merging events, which had agreed to a spread of situations they believed would have allowed the deal to proceed, by saying it will facet with the advice of the Competitors Fee that the deal be blocked on competitors grounds. The tribunal has not but offered the explanations for its resolution.
The method on the competitors authorities has taken three years, a lifetime within the know-how trade and a delay that has been roundly criticised not solely by those that supported the transaction but additionally by those that have been against it.
The transfer is seen as a devastating blow to Maziv and its shareholders, which had deliberate to make use of the proceeds of the Vodacom funding to plough R10-billion or extra into the deployment of fibre networks in underserviced components of South Africa, together with townships. The choice may additionally halt consolidation within the trade that had been anticipated to comply with the merger.
Uys informed the Sunday Occasions that the tribunal’s resolution is “not the message we need to ship out to the world”.
“The president (Cyril Ramaphosa) stands up yearly and says he’s calling trade to decide to infrastructure funding. It is a excellent instance of infrastructure funding, and the general public curiosity advantages we’ve dedicated to make it a no brainer,” Uys informed Barron.
‘Too lengthy’
He additionally lambasted the competitors authorities for the time it took them to think about the deserves of the transaction. “To go away corporations that need to make investments billions within the nation in limbo for 3 years just like the competitors authorities did, is simply too lengthy, it’s unacceptable,” mentioned Uys.
Vodacom Group CEO Shameel Joosub beforehand described the tribunal’s resolution to ban the merger as “deeply shocking and disappointing”.
Learn: Vodacom and Maziv: a contrarian viewpoint
Vodacom mentioned even the division of commerce, trade & competitors, which has oversight of the competitors regulators, had supported the merger. This was based mostly on the merging events committing to:
- Investing no less than R10-billion over a five-year interval, predominantly in low-income areas;
- Passing no less than one million new properties in lower-income areas over a five-year interval;
- Creating as much as 10 000 new jobs;
- Establishing a R300-million enterprise and provider improvement fund to prioritise the event of small companies;
- Offering high-speed web to over 600 adjoining faculties and police stations for gratis; and
- Vodacom investing as much as R14-billion into South Africa by the transaction.
Learn: South Africa’s competitors authorities have to be reined in
“I’m deeply shocked and disillusioned by the tribunal’s resolution. South Africa desperately wants further important funding, particularly in digital infrastructure in lower-income areas,” mentioned Joosub.
“Our funding of as much as R14-billion would have modified tens of millions of lives and created hundreds of jobs. This comes after the issues of our rivals, concerned within the competitors hearings course of, and the division of commerce, trade & competitors have been comprehensively addressed by treatments and commitments by the events,” he mentioned. — © 2024 NewsCentral Media
Get breaking information from TechCentral on WhatsApp. Join right here
