The Affiliation of Impartial Publishers (AIP) and Google have introduced the institution of a Digital Information Transformation (DNT) Fund to “help the sustainability and digital transformation of small, native and impartial information publishers in South Africa by focused project-based funding”.
The institution of the DNT Fund comes at a important second, as information publishers face market failure, the closure of publications and growing job losses amongst journalists. This monetary injection serves as much-needed oxygen for a sector already described as being in ICU.
This piece was initially printed on Michael Markovitz’s Substack, Media Explorations – learn the unique article right here
Funding can also be vital for one more elementary motive: NGOs, think-tanks and worldwide organisations have clearly demonstrated that the sustainability of democracy is deeply intertwined with the viability of public curiosity media. The help for the notion of public curiosity journalism as a public good is gaining traction globally, with organisations just like the Worldwide Fund for Public Curiosity Media taking part in an more and more vital position. Just lately, Worldwide Media Help launched an in depth examine on types of funding, financing and funding for public curiosity media.
Monetary help for public curiosity journalism needs to be welcomed, offered it’s guided by clear and commonsense standards, as persuasively outlined in a 2023 coverage paper for the World Discussion board for Media Growth.
AIP govt director Kate Skinner and AIP’s companions needs to be praised for working tirelessly behind the scenes for over a yr to make sure that the governance of the DNT Fund and the distribution of grants adhere to key rules. These rules have been strongly supported by the South African Nationwide Editors’ Discussion board (Sanef), the Press Council and different stakeholders. Google additionally deserves recognition for agreeing that membership of the self-regulatory Press Council needs to be a situation for receiving funding grants.
Critics could spotlight that the DNT Fund represents solely a minuscule fraction of Google father or mother Alphabet’s reported revenues of US$307-billion in 2023, of which 76% got here from promoting. Nonetheless, evaluating these funds to Google’s huge revenues just isn’t precisely an acceptable reference level, provided that the mixed GDP of many nation states is equally dwarfed by Google’s annual earnings.
Reduction
Within the South African context, Google’s dedication of R114-million over three years (R38-million/yr) represents a big and vital place to begin. In keeping with AIP and Google, the DNT Fund “will present project-based funding to assist small, native and impartial information publishers develop and strengthen their digital operations, enhance their viewers attain and engagement, and improve the sustainability of their journalism.”
For additional particulars on governance, eligibility, and feedback from Google, AIP and others – together with data on numerous grant ranges – please consult with the launch media assertion and accompanying background supplies right here.
Set to start in March 2025, the DNT Fund will undoubtedly provide some aid to struggling information publishers. Nonetheless, this intervention, whereas essential, just isn’t adequate to deal with the platform-related, systemic market failures which have eroded the viability of stories media and, by extension, South Africa’s democratic well being.
The timing of the fund’s launch coincides with anticipation of the Competitors Fee’s provisional report on the Media and Digital Platforms Market Inquiry. Whether or not the fee’s regulatory cures will impose stricter obligations on digital platforms stays to be seen. Nonetheless, a stronger response from the fee is essential. Past the institution of journalism funds, there are deeper structural points that require pressing consideration, together with:
- Alleged anticompetitive practices by platforms;
- The huge energy asymmetries between platforms and publishers; and
- The unregulated use of AI crawlers that extract worth from expensively produced content material with out compensating information publishers.
As well as, Sanef has requested the fee to bear in mind:
- The availability of entry to credible information as a public good needs to be handled as a primary human rights challenge, not solely as a business competitors challenge;
- Truthful compensation for information within the public curiosity used on tech platforms, based mostly on the worth that they derive from this content material;
- Prioritisation of credible information (these subscribing to an impartial self-regulatory physique and an moral code) by tech platforms and actively utilizing such content material as an antidote for misinformation and disinformation; and
- Transparency and sharing of knowledge and algorithms associated to information content material and associated promoting on the tech platforms, in addition to knowledge that publishers can use to advertise and monetise their content material.
The fee’s provisional report, rescheduled for launch on 29 November, has confronted extra delays and is now anticipated earlier than year-end.
Disclosure: The Gibs Media Management Suppose Tank, in partnership with Sanef, the Press Council and AIP, has made joint submissions to the Competitors Fee’s media and digital platforms inquiry. This engagement underscores the think-tank’s dedication to the sustainability and integrity of South Africa’s information and data ecosystem.
Don’t miss:
Malatsi was proper to scrap the SABC Invoice – now urgency is required
