The discharge of the Competitors Fee’s report detailing the findings of its Media and Digital Platforms Market Inquiry — a probe which sought to stipulate the affect of multinational expertise giants reminiscent of Google and Fb on the sustainability of native media — has been delayed as soon as once more, this time to 2025.
The report was initially anticipated in November, however the fee prolonged its launch to December – and has now bounced it into subsequent 12 months. It cited the necessity to “meet the very best accuracy, thoroughness and credibility requirements” as cause for the delay.
“The inquiry was initiated as a result of the fee has cause to imagine that there are market options on digital platforms that distribute information media content material that impede, distort or limit competitors, or undermine the needs of the [Competition] Act, and which have materials implications for the information media sector in South Africa. The revised timeline displays the inquiry’s dedication to addressing vital components important to the report’s high quality,” the Competitors Fee mentioned in a Thursday assertion.
Public hearings for the inquiry kicked off in March, the place numerous media trade stakeholders introduced to the fee. Then-Media24 CEO Ishmet Davidson informed the Competitors Fee that Google is sucking promoting income out of South Africa, making it more and more troublesome for native publications to outlive. He mentioned even News24, regardless of its dimension, is loss making – and he pointed the finger at Google and rival Meta Platforms, the proprietor of Fb, for the dire scenario dealing with native publishers.
Davidson mentioned News24 was “compelled” in 2020 to implement a paywall round a lot of its content material, although the income from subscriptions “has not almost been ample to offset the decline in promoting income”.
However monetary points have been solely a part of the problems at play. The South African Nationwide Editors Discussion board (Sanef) known as for Huge Tech platforms to be held accountable for the content material they distribute in a lot the identical method South African publications are held to an editorial customary.
Media help fund
“Information producers are legally answerable for the content material they produce, however as Huge Tech you’ll be able to dodge duty by saying it’s third-party content material and never yours, though they earn cash from it,” mentioned Man Berger, director for freedom of expression and media growth at Unesco and a former head of the Faculty of Journalism at Rhodes College.
In a June interview with TechCentral, previous to performing further “off-camera” interviews with trade specialists and different stakeholders, senior Competitors Fee analyst Noluthando Jokazi mentioned the fee was mulling the creation of a media help fund that will be contributed to by Huge Tech – a transfer favoured by competitors authorities in Canada, Australia and elsewhere with blended success.
Based on the fee, a few of the components contributing to the delay within the publication of the report embrace:
- Additional consultations with specialists, who have been consulted to resolve rising questions and tackle unresolved points;
- Stakeholders’ expectations for a reputable and detailed doc;
- The complexity of the submissions in areas reminiscent of ad-tech and AI, every requiring an in depth evaluation to make sure accuracy; and
- Skilled contributions requiring specialised scrutiny to make sure correct interpretation within the report.
Learn: Media24 blasts Google – the Fourth Property is ‘on its knees’
“The provisional report have to be subjected to inner Competitors Fee evaluation processes and choices, which have additionally impacted the unique timeline. It would embrace preliminary findings, cures and suggestions, and can enable for six weeks of stakeholder feedback,” the Competitors Fee mentioned. – © 2024 NewsCentral Media
Get breaking information from TechCentral on WhatsApp. Join right here
Don’t miss:
Huge Tech have to be held accountable for information content material: Sanef
