When finance minister Enoch Godongwana offered his delayed funds speech on 12 March amid the furore over a proposed VAT hike, blockchain-based digital property have been the elephant within the room.
Regardless of the Intergovernmental Fintech Working Group (IFWG) publishing a place paper on regulating crypto property in June 2021, little additional tangible progress has been made since then, at a time when different nations are forging forward with new laws on blockchain-based digital property as they realise the potential advantages and constructive affect digital property might have on financial progress and GDP.
Whereas the Monetary Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) included the crypto asset service supplier (Casp) licensing regime below the Monetary Advisory and Middleman Providers (Fais) Act in 2023 to grant gamers monetary service supplier licences, no different materials developments have emerged from the IFWG.
Nonetheless, South Africa’s grey-listing by the Monetary Motion Activity Drive (FATF) in February 2023 impacted the present framework, with the compliance burden now falling on suppliers to align with FATF on journey, know your buyer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) laws.
The failure of the federal government to combine the digital asset sector into the formal monetary companies house and broader financial system additionally represents a missed alternative to shore up falling tax revenues and cut back the widening funds deficit.
Realising significant affect when it comes to integrating digital applied sciences throughout various industries necessitates assist from a digital financial system, which entails the digitisation of tangible entities, reminiscent of possession, id, information and forex, all facilitated by blockchain know-how.
New life
With the right laws, the burgeoning digital financial system can breathe new life into South Africa’s ailing financial system. Whereas the crypto asset ship has not sailed simply but, the federal government must act sooner moderately than later to unlock worth from the sector.
Stagnation within the IFWG on crucial areas reminiscent of change management laws, authoritative steerage on the varied tax implications and varied different elements, just like the tokenisation of conventional property, is delaying the mass adoption of assorted crypto initiatives, together with funds.
Learn: Crypto crackdown in South Africa
With cryptocurrencies not deemed forex, they’re at the moment not included in change management laws, however the trade wants steerage and the understanding that regulators present to drive funding and innovation.
As such, the trade desperately wants extra lively engagement and tangible efforts from the IFWG to assist the adoption and enlargement of the utilisation of the asset class with laws that strike the suitable steadiness between stakeholder security and stability with out stifling trade innovation.
As a substitute, the IFWG has seemingly expanded its scope to stablecoins as detailed within the 2025 funds assessment tabled. The group lately finalised a diagnostic of the home stablecoin panorama, which it plans to publish later in 2025, and continues its analytical work to grasp the relevant use circumstances of stablecoins and suggest an applicable coverage and regulatory response.
Whereas this differs from the work it did in 2021 in relation to cryptocurrencies, it’s a welcome improvement for a number of causes.
Whereas stablecoins are technically a sort of cryptocurrency, the distinction is that they’re pegged to a reserve asset, reminiscent of a central bank-backed fiat forex, to keep up a secure worth. For instance, tether and circle are US-domiciled stablecoins, with a market capitalisation of greater than US$200-billion, issued by personal firms which might be backed by the US greenback.
Stablecoins are additionally totally different from central financial institution digital currencies (CBDCs). Whereas each intention to supply digital alternate options to conventional cash, stablecoins are decentralised non-native tokens issued by good contracts and used for crypto transactions, remittances and decentralised finance, whereas CBDCs are official digital currencies issued by central banks for funds and monetary inclusion, making them a direct legal responsibility of the federal government.
Whereas unbacked crypto property like bitcoin and ether successfully function a retailer of worth and medium of change, their volatility precludes them from performing as a unit of account.
In distinction, stablecoins successfully handle this challenge as their worth is pegged to an exterior reference asset. This creates alternatives for companies to transact utilizing stablecoins, with huge potential advantages for cross-border commerce.
Stablecoins for fee
In 2022, Forvis Mazars in South Africa piloted an initiative together with the Asia-Pacific area to analyze the feasibility of accepting stablecoins as fee from an accounting, money movement and threat perspective.
The system enabled cross-border funds in a fiat-backed stablecoin between the Asian and native entities. The transaction cleared inside 4 hours, with the rand mirrored within the native checking account on the identical day. If conventional banking rails have been utilised, it might have taken as much as every week to finish the transaction.
Learn: Luno pushes treasury to recognise bitcoin as an ‘onshore asset’
Given the velocity and effectivity of the transaction, it’s clear why the worth of stablecoin transactions rose each quarter in 2024 to exceed the worldwide volumes processed by Visa and Mastercard.
The surge in adoption and utilization during the last 12 months has thrust stablecoins into the mainstream international monetary companies sector, which is prompting governments, together with South Africa’s, to discover the potential use circumstances and challenges that will come up.
The flexibility to facilitate sooner and cheaper cross-border remittance is especially useful for a rustic that engages in worldwide commerce and runs such a big commerce deficit.
Utilizing stablecoins can drastically cut back the prices related to paying for items and companies internationally, whereas the massive migrant workforce also can ship a reimbursement to their households at a decrease value.
There are additionally quite a few tech companies that need to put money into South Africa utilising cryptocurrencies as a way of capital.
Nonetheless, digital property don’t at the moment meet change management laws, as they aren’t recognised as a regular type of forex and, due to this fact, overseas inflows and can’t be positioned on report with the South African Reserve Financial institution for subsequent reimbursement. The necessity to use legacy banking rails, versus cryptocurrencies, to put money into native firms is limiting potential direct overseas funding into South Africa.
Moreover, giving native companies the power to transact utilizing stablecoins and leveraging of the benefits it provides, might enhance exports to assist cross-border commerce, which might additionally facilitate extra overseas inflows into South Africa to spice up GDP and develop the financial system.
Nonetheless, earlier than that may occur, the nation wants a regulated atmosphere that’s built-in in to numerous aspects from a sensible standpoint to make sure that these processes are amended to permit and assist the usage of stablecoins.
Medium of change
For example, legacy mechanisms already make exporting items complicated and cumbersome. This course of requires a SAD500 customs declaration type and a Distinctive Consignment Reference (UCR) code to clear customs. The problem is that exporters can not at the moment embody cryptocurrency or stablecoins as a medium of change in these types.
As well as, as a decentralised medium of change with transactions processed over the blockchain, there isn’t any third-party supplier that may challenge a doc to supply proof of fee. With out this authentication, exporters at the moment can not settle for stablecoins for items, regardless of the efficiencies.
Learn: Crypto’s subsequent bubble can be politically motivated
The identical challenge would come up ought to the South African Income Service request supporting documentation to confirm VAT submissions on zero-rated exports. In these situations, exporters would solely have the movement of on-chain actions to show the transaction occurred, which is at the moment not an accepted type of validation.
To spice up adoption and utilization, the IFWG would wish to supply better readability on what these regulatory frameworks would seem like, however it’s unclear whether or not the working paper due for launch later this yr will cowl these points.
It’s crucial that the federal government expedite these issues and ship agency resolutions. There are a lot of nations which have formalised these laws, which implies South Africa is already a laggard in cryptocurrency-based fintech innovation.
The chance value is very large and continues to develop. For example, if South Africa had taken a first-mover strategy to ascertain a strategic bitcoin reserve in 2020, it might not have required VAT will increase to cowl the funds shortfall.
Equally, if Eskom had used durations the place it had surplus energy to mine bitcoin, it might not carry the debt burden it does at the moment.
South Africa wants an angle shift that embraces the potential that cryptocurrencies and stablecoins provide, along with better urgency in creating and enacting enabling laws. Time will inform whether or not the IFWG can handle the elephant within the room.
Get breaking information from TechCentral on WhatsApp. Join right here.
- The writer, Wiehann Olivier, is a companion and fintech and digital property lead for Forvis Mazars
